Giving depositions as a defendant or an expert.
نویسنده
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Malpractice issues in radiology: res ipsa loquitur.
1475 phy, most likely due to contamination of the contrast medium or spinal needle used for the myelography. The plaintiff’s expert asserted that the fault lay with the radiologist or technologists under his supervision at the time. The expert witness retained by the defense, in his deposition, disagreed that the defendant–radiologist was responsible for the complication that arose from the mye...
متن کاملFalse confessions, expert testimony, and admissibility.
The confession of a criminal defendant serves as a prosecutor's most compelling piece of evidence during trial. Courts must preserve a defendant's constitutional right to a fair trial while upholding the judicial interests of presenting competent and reliable evidence to the jury. When a defendant seeks to challenge the validity of that confession through expert testimony, the prosecution often...
متن کاملThe role of psychiatry in death penalty defense.
The author describes his experience as an expert in evaluating defendants convicted of capital murder. He reviews the Supreme Court decisions and provisions of state law that have led defense attorneys to obtain psychiatric evaluations of their clients. Three illustrative cases are presented, one of an incompetent grossly impaired defendant, one of a defendant for whom the finding of mental hea...
متن کاملThe purposes of impleader claim
Impleader claim is one of ancillary suits which permit to the parties to implead third person to the action and became that person one of parties. The Iran civil procedure code, unlike some other countries for example Lebanon no attention to purposes of Impleader claim and in Article 135 the subject is expressed in general terms. With attention to generally speaking of this Article and re...
متن کاملSupreme Court Confirms Expert Testimony Required to Establish Causation in Legal Mal Cases
v. Papastavros, 323 Conn. 275 (Sept. 27, 2016), the Connecticut Supreme Court ruled that expert testimony is required to establish the element of causation in a legal malpractice case. Thus, even where an attorney’s performance was deficient, if the plaintiff cannot present expert testimony that the outcome of her case would have been different but for the attorney’s negligence, the attorney wi...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Proceedings
دوره 19 1 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006